Loading . . .

  • Why Us
  • Contact
Economy

Five Charts for the Week That Was: March 6, 2026

March 6, 2026 by Jeanette Garretty, Chief Economist

In times of extreme uncertainty, sometimes the best that one can do is to put some guardrails around one’s fears. Bloomberg has attempted to do just that by looking at the effect on inflation and growth in the US and the European theater of a sustained higher oil price. It is important to emphasize “sustained”; the greatest uncertainty at this moment is the length of time for which Middle East oil and gas deliveries will be curtailed by the Iranian War. One reason that US shale oil producers have declined to commit to increasing production is the lack of clarity on how long elevated oil prices might persist; economic effects differ considerably as things move from temporary to quasi-permanent. Nevertheless, Bloomberg’s analysis of both price scenarios supports the current view that the impact on US inflation and growth is less than one might expect, and decidedly less than in Europe.


Historically, Saudi Arabia has been the notable “safety valve” for oil market interruptions from volatile producers like Iran and Venezuela.  Saudi Arabia’s large Ras Tanura field has been targeted by Iranian drones and missiles, but little damage has been reported. The biggest problem is that the Saudi’s are also heavily dependent upon getting crude out to the world via the Straits of Hormuz.  If the US moves forward on plans to provide US Navy protection and US government insurance to oil moving through the Straits, Saudi Arabia may be the biggest beneficiary of this largesse. In the meantime, there is a quiet effort underway to get crude out via the East-West Pipeline and Red Sea ports.  The East-West Pipeline can handle approximately 5 million barrels per day (mmbd), and another 2 million mmbd can go through other pipelines intended for natural gas.  Cutting natural gas shipments, however, makes some problems much worse (see below.)


A focus on oil is only one part of the picture in terms of energy and the economic impact of the war.  For example, European natural gas prices have surged in excess of 50% as Qatar first curtailed and then shut down its natural gas liquefaction (LNG) facilities.  Qatar supplies 20% of global LNG and is a major supplier to Europe, though China, India, Japan, and South Korea are thought to be its largest markets.  The largest LNG producer is the United States, and, over time, its exports of LNG have increased, sometimes controversially because of fears that LNG exports will raise domestic natural gas prices. Yet, the ability of the US to fill the supply shortfall created by Qatar is limited. At this point, if Qatar has truly completely closed down the Ras Laffan LNG export facility and associated liquefaction operations – the world’s largest—it will take two weeks to restart the operations.


US natural gas usage by industry is fairly typical of other developed global markets, with the caveat that countries without domestic oil or coal resources are even more dependent on natural gas for electric power and residential/commercial heating. Industrial uses of natural gas are primarily in chemicals, plastics, and fertilizer production. Natural gas prices in the United States rose 81% in January 2026 due to a seasonal increase in residential/commercial demand attributable to cold weather, volatility that is not unusual in the marketplace. Upward pressure on US prices due to world events may be mitigated by declining demand as the weather warms, but it is quite possible that the price level will remain higher than in past years, adding to the monthly budget pain already facing a number of US households.


A net loss of 92,000 jobs in February doesn’t help the budget—federal government or individual household—worries either.  The decline announced on Friday was unexpectedly large, driven by employment weakness across many sectors.  However, the Bureau of Labor Statistics report was part of three days of mixed messages on employment: a downward revision in the ADP January employment numbers, a sharp reduction in job cuts in February according to the Challenger job cuts report, and an upbeat message on small business employment from the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB).  The next meeting of the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC), on March 17-18, is suddenly looking very interesting . . .

Investment advisory services offered through Robertson Stephens Wealth Management, LLC (“Robertson Stephens”), an SEC-registered investment advisor. Registration does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. This material is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice. It does not constitute a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security, has not been tailored to the needs of any specific investor, and should not provide the basis for any investment decision. Please consult with your Advisor prior to making any investment decisions. The information contained herein was compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but Robertson Stephens does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Information, views and opinions are current as of the date of this presentation, are based on the information available at the time, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. Robertson Stephens assumes no duty to update this information. Unless otherwise noted, any individual opinions presented are those of the author and not necessarily those of Robertson Stephens. Performance may be compared to several indices. Indices are unmanaged and reflect the reinvestment of all income or dividends but do not reflect the deduction of any fees or expenses which would reduce returns. A complete list of Robertson Stephens Investment Office recommendations over the previous 12 months is available upon request. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Forward-looking performance objectives, targets or estimates are not guaranteed and may not be achieved. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Alternative investments are speculative and involve substantial risks including significant loss of principal, high illiquidity, long time horizons, uneven growth rates, high fees, onerous tax consequences, limited transparency and limited regulation. Alternative investments are not suitable for all investors and are only available to qualified investors. Please refer to the private placement memorandum for a complete listing and description of terms and risks. This material is an investment advisory publication intended for investment advisory clients and prospective clients only. Robertson Stephens only transacts business in states in which it is properly registered or is excluded or exempted from registration. A copy of Robertson Stephens’ current written disclosure brochure filed with the SEC which discusses, among other things, Robertson Stephens’ business practices, services and fees, is available through the SEC’s website at: www.adviserinfo.sec.gov. © 2026 Robertson Stephens Wealth Management, LLC. All rights reserved. Robertson Stephens is a registered trademark of Robertson Stephens Wealth Management, LLC in the United States and elsewhere. A3064

In the current market, are you spending more time defending portfolios than pursuing new client growth?

Blog Form

This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form

What are the top 3 priorities for your practice for the remainder of the year?

Select 3 from the options below so we can help you accomplish your goals/priorities.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Top 3 priorities(Required)
Tell us how we can contact you about accomplishing your goals/priorities.
Name*(Required)